I love Val Lewton films. And I love a good film montage. So, I thought, why combine both?
Friday, July 29, 2011
Sunday, July 17, 2011
What a Disaster!
After seeing the classic (???) disaster films The Towering Inferno and Earthquake, a certain similarity between them struck me as both interesting, yet bewildering.
It wasn't the cardboard characters, the emphasis on special effects, the amazingly corny dialog, or how overlong they were. It was this:
The filmmakers have some kind of grudge against skyscrapers.
Both films have gung-ho male leads who wail at some point about how whatever gimmicky disaster featured could have been averted if mankind had been content to have short buildings, instead of building great towers that seem to welcome Armageddons with open arms.
Well, they don't put it so eloquently, but you get the idea. There is plenty of hate going around for tall buildings. Not the lazy government people (and believe me, they always turn up in these kinds of films), not the shoddy cuntruction that contributes to the descruction and the loss of lives. But the building itself.
So in the mindset of the films:
Skyscrapers = Towers of Babel = magnets for disaster = Bad news for mankind!
It wasn't the cardboard characters, the emphasis on special effects, the amazingly corny dialog, or how overlong they were. It was this:
The filmmakers have some kind of grudge against skyscrapers.
Both films have gung-ho male leads who wail at some point about how whatever gimmicky disaster featured could have been averted if mankind had been content to have short buildings, instead of building great towers that seem to welcome Armageddons with open arms.
Well, they don't put it so eloquently, but you get the idea. There is plenty of hate going around for tall buildings. Not the lazy government people (and believe me, they always turn up in these kinds of films), not the shoddy cuntruction that contributes to the descruction and the loss of lives. But the building itself.
So in the mindset of the films:
Skyscrapers = Towers of Babel = magnets for disaster = Bad news for mankind!
![]() |
| Both images from impawards.com |
Thursday, June 30, 2011
Why "Return to Oz" (1985) is the Scariest Film Disney Ever Made.
6. The Deadly Desert
This surrounds the Marvelous Land of Oz. Anyone who is unlucky enough to touch it is turned into sand. You only see this happen to the horrible Wheelers, but still...
5. The (Practically) Deserted Emerald City
Just showing Dorothy wandering through the ruined City, with its crumbling walls and eerie statues of what used to be people, is just plain eerie. It doesn't help to know what it contains as well....
4.The Wheelers
This creatures may stink at capturing Dorothy (I blame their lack of hands), but that does not prevent them from being utterly terrifying. This is where sound effects help to add to the fear factor. The squeaky wheels and their sharp screams to alert their fellows, and their echoing laughter is enough to make any child eye their bike with more than a little dread.
3. The Nome King and his Minions
2. Mombi and her Heads
Mombi is a witch. She collects heads. This heads can scream if you cross them. Did I mention that Mombi can walk around without a head?
1. Dorothy's Trials
She nearly goes through electroshock therapy, drowns in a monstrous rainstorm, gets beheaded, falls to her death, get turned into an ornament...and oh so much more. You would have to hard pressed to find another child who goes through so many near-death experiences in a film (unless it is part of the Harry Potter Series). It is no wonder that she spends half the film with a terrified look on her face.
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
Saturday, June 11, 2011
A Little Experiment: Part 2
I did it. I rewatched Man with a Thousand Faces (1957), fulfilling the plans of my past post. It is rather strange, viewing something from my youth, at the dawning of my interest in old films. And what can I say about this second viewing experience?
Well, for one thing, I now know what it must feel for a baseball fan to watch The Pride of the Yankees or Fear Strikes Out: plenty of (mostly fictional) elaboration on the personal life of the real-life protagonist, and not enough visualization of what made them great. Now, sometimes that it understandable. Lord knows how much more I could stand to watch Anthony Perkins play ball like a girl when portraying Jimmy Piersall.
But I digress. I am not here to discuss baseball biopics, but an actor biopic, specifically of the legendary Lon Chaney Sr. And boy, is this a whopper. It begins with Chaney's youth, raised by deaf-mute parents.
He works in Vaudville with his wife (Dorothy Malone), who is unlikable because she:
1. Has a paranoid fear of their unborn child (and future Wolf Man) being born deaf
2. Puts her singing career before her family
Because she is such a bad mother, Chaney divorces her, and gets a relatively steady job getting extra work and bit parts in the picture business. He gets married to a wonderful woman (Jane Greer), and his carer takes off after his work as a fake cripple in The Miracle Man.
I guess that I should point out that Cagney was about 56 when he made this film, 9 years older than Chaney was when he died. While age differences between actors and their real-life counterparts are far from unusual, in this case it is especially jarring.
There are reenactments of scenes from such classic Cagney films as The Hunchback of Notre Dame, The Phantom of the Opera, and Laugh Clown Laugh. This would cool, if they got the frickin' reenactments right! But I could let those pass by, were it not for one thing...The make-up.
Good Lord, the make-up. Or should, I say, the really crude rubber masks that bare no resemblance to Chaney's original classic designs. I know that Cagney's face was rounder than Chaney's, so that they would not look similar, but still...the horror, the horror.
My memories of the film were pretty close, considering it had been about 10 years since I last saw it. I don't why certain parts stuck out so much. It wasn't because I considered it a particularly great film at the time, and I still don't, but there must have been something that intrigued me. At the time I first watched it, I must have already known about Chaney and his make-up creations. It is quite possibly my first bio-pic.
Overall, I thought that it was an okay, if disappointing film.
Friday, May 27, 2011
What a Story!
(Vincent Price was born 100 years ago today. I thought that this occasion deserved a special post)
Let me tell you a story. It is the outline of a film that I saw not too long ago. Based on a classic piece of literature, it was strange, dark, and intriguing. It left an impression on me. And here it goes:
Once upon a time, there was a girl in England
Let me tell you a story. It is the outline of a film that I saw not too long ago. Based on a classic piece of literature, it was strange, dark, and intriguing. It left an impression on me. And here it goes:
Once upon a time, there was a girl in England
She appeared uninteresting, but she was full of determination
One day, she traveled not to far away from a forboding old house
Due to an accident with a horse, she met the owner of the house, a brooding and mysterious man.
She was intrigued by this man.
She did not know much of his past, but that did not prevent her from being attracted to him.
But something came between their relationship
A woman
But not just any woman: it was the man's wife.
This dark haired beauty haunted his house and his mind.
Eventually, it ended in flames.
The wife is destroyed in the flame, but at a great cost to the man.
Among other things, he loses his eyesight.
But the girl ends up Okay.
The End
And this is the basic outline of one of the most original and strange classic films that I have ever seen...
And it is called..
And it is called..
Jane Eyre
oh wait....don't get me wrong, I really like this film (the Orson Welles version, at least)
No, I am talking about a real classic:
The Tomb of Ligeia
Sure, it takes plot points from Jane Eyre, in addition to the flaming finale (complete with footage from House of Usher) from previous Roger Corman-Vincent Price-Edgar Allan Poe adaptations.
Though I do not consider it the best film that meshed these three men together (that would be a tie between Usher and The Pit and the Pendulum).
But I still love it.
Maybe it is the over elaborate dialogue.
One such tasty morsel occurs during Vernon's (our "hero", played wonderfully by Price) brief wooing of Lady Rowena (an equally great Elizabeth Shepard).
Sure, it takes plot points from Jane Eyre, in addition to the flaming finale (complete with footage from House of Usher) from previous Roger Corman-Vincent Price-Edgar Allan Poe adaptations.
Though I do not consider it the best film that meshed these three men together (that would be a tie between Usher and The Pit and the Pendulum).
But I still love it.
Maybe it is the over elaborate dialogue.
One such tasty morsel occurs during Vernon's (our "hero", played wonderfully by Price) brief wooing of Lady Rowena (an equally great Elizabeth Shepard).
"Your hair...it makes a shamble of the light."
Maybe it is the lovely shots of the English countryside.
As well as the foreboding cobwebed interiors of Vernon's manor.
Perhaps it is the direction, the acting, the cinematography, the cliché's that occur in all of Corman's Poe films.....
Or maybe it is the story, which turns Jane Eyre
On its head
Inside out
and traps it in mists of Misery
Obsession
and Dispair.
Maybe it is the lovely shots of the English countryside.
As well as the foreboding cobwebed interiors of Vernon's manor.
Perhaps it is the direction, the acting, the cinematography, the cliché's that occur in all of Corman's Poe films.....
Or maybe it is the story, which turns Jane Eyre
On its head
Inside out
and traps it in mists of Misery
Obsession
and Dispair.
Sunday, May 8, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
















